Diana Franco · 2018 · Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal · Open access
This article explores migration trauma among Mexican and Central American unaccompanied refugee minors (URM) with the purpose of developing an understanding of migration as a tripartite process consisting of: pre-migration exposure to traumatic stressors, in-journey stressors, and post-migration stressors. The migration experience of these youth may be subjectively different depending on a wide range of factors. The complexities of migration are explored as a traumatic, tripartite process. These three salient components of migration may act as precursors, often resulting in psychological sequelae such as: post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, and depression. Of all migrant groups, URM are more likely to develop psychiatric symptoms. Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT), Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for Trauma in Schools (CBITS), and Mental Health for Immigrants Program (MHIP) are among the most effective interventions in the treatment of PTSD, anxiety, and depression in refugee minors. Social workers in schools are in unique positions to provide mental health services to URM. A case example illustrating a cultural adaptation of TF-CBT in an urban public high school is included. Clinical implications of culturally responsive and trauma-informed treatment of URM in schools will be discussed. Additionally, this article will emphasize the importance of bridging the gap between research and culturally responsive, trauma-informed interventions for URM in schools.
Research and education tool only. Not for diagnosis, emergency care, legal advice, or treatment recommendations. Verify citations against original sources.
Charlene Treanor et al. · 2021 · JMIR Mental Health · Open access
BACKGROUND: Mental ill-health presents a major public health problem. A potential part solution that is receiving increasing attention is computer-delivered psychological therapy, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic as health care systems moved to remote service delivery. However, computerized cognitive behavioral therapy (cCBT) requires active engagement by service users, and low adherence may minimize treatment effectiveness. Therefore, it is important to investigate the acceptability of cCBT to understand implementation issues and maximize potential benefits. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to produce a critical appraisal of published reviews about the acceptability of cCBT for adults. METHODS: An umbrella review informed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology identified systematic reviews about the acceptability of cCBT for common adult mental disorders. Acceptability was operationalized in terms of uptake of, dropping out from, or completion of cCBT treatment; factors that facilitated or impeded adherence; and reports about user, carer, and health care professional experience and satisfaction with cCBT. Databases were searched using search terms informed by relevant published research. Review selection and quality appraisal were guided by the JBI methodology and the AMSTAR tool and undertaken independently by 2 reviewers. RESULTS: The systematic searches of databases identified 234 titles, and 9 reviews (covering 151 unique studies) met the criteria. Most studies were comprised of service users with depression, anxiety, or specifically, panic disorder or phobia. Operationalization of acceptability varied across reviews, thereby making it difficult to synthesize results. There was a similar number of guided and unguided cCBT programs; 34% of guided and 36% of unguided users dropped out; and guidance included email, telephone, face-to-face, and discussion forum support. Guided cCBT was completed in full by 8%-74% of the participants, while 94% completed one module and 67%-84% completed some modules. Unguided cCBT was completed in full by 16%-66% of participants, while 95% completed one module and 54%-93% completed some modules. Guided cCBT appeared to be associated with adherence (sustained via telephone). A preference for face-to-face CBT compared to cCBT (particularly for users who reported feeling isolated), internet or computerized delivery problems, negative perceptions about cCBT, low motivation, too busy or not having enough time, and personal circumstances were stated as reasons for dropping out. Yet, some users favored the anonymous nature of cCBT, and the capacity to undertake cCBT in one's own time was deemed beneficial but also led to avoidance of cCBT. There was inconclusive evidence for an association between sociodemographic variables, mental health status, and cCBT adherence or dropping out. Users tended to be satisfied with cCBT, reported improvements in mental health, and recommended cCBT. Overall, the results indicated that service users' preferences were important considerations regarding the use of cCBT. CONCLUSIONS: The review indicated that "one size did not fit all" regarding the acceptability of cCBT and that individual tailoring of cCBT is required in order to increase population reach, uptake, and adherence and therefore, deliver treatment benefits and improve mental health.
In September 2010, 408,425 children and adolescents resided in foster care. Recent legislation highlights an increasing focus on involving pediatricians in supporting children in foster care and defines specific requirements relevant to the role of pediatricians.After completing this article, readers should be able to: Foster care is intended to provide a temporary haven for children during a time of family crisis when children are at imminent risk for harm. The goals of foster care are to promote child health, safety, permanency, and well-being. Foster care also has the mission of building on family strengths and providing birth parents with the services they need to reconnect (reunify) with their children. Because children fare best in stable and nurturing families, there has been an increased emphasis in the past decade on shortening the time to permanency through reunification, placement with relatives, and adoption. Foster care also has the obligation to prepare youth for independent living when none of these permanency options is possible.In some states, more than one third of children in foster care are in court-ordered (formal) kinship placements, arrangements in which the related (kin) caregiver may or may not be a certified foster parent. Even outside the child welfare system, somewhere between 4% and 8% of children reside with members of their extended family, neighbors, or friends for a variety of reasons.During the past decade, several studies were published reporting that children experience greater placement stability in kinship care than in nonrelative foster care, and that kin caregivers report fewer child behavior problems. Other data indicate that children in kinship care have as many issues as children in foster care, and that kinship caregivers are older, are less healthy, and have less access to services than nonrelative foster parents. However, recognizing that maintaining a child’s ties to his or her family of origin holds advantages for the child, relatively more children are being placed in kinship care as a result of child protective investigation.Other children are spending brief amounts of time in foster care while child welfare attempts to identify and investigate kinship resources. The definition of kin has expanded to include nonrelatives, such as family friends, acquaintances, and neighbors. There is little information about the outcomes of reunification with parents or kinship care, including child health and mental health outcomes and the percentage of kinship homes that undergo disruption. The vast majority of kinship placements are without oversight or subsidy, although recent federal legislation was intended to improve financial support for this group of caregivers.Children in foster care are classified as children who have special health-care needs by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) because of their high prevalence of medical, emotional, behavioral, developmental, educational, and dental health-care problems. Most pediatric practitioners will encounter children and adolescents in foster or kinship care in their practices. It is important that pediatricians be familiar with the effects of childhood trauma and adversity, separation from family, and ongoing uncertainty on child behavior, mental health, and development.Pediatricians are in a unique position to identify problems, make appropriate referrals, and offer support and advice to caregivers. Foster care ideally should be developmentally appropriate and child-centered, and pediatricians can play a crucial role in offering developmentally sound advice and emotional support to caregivers about parenting traumatized children and children who have significant behavior problems. Pediatricians also should suggest ways to promote placement stability and successful permanency.Most maltreated children are not removed from their birth parents, but they appear to have the same health issues as children in foster and kinship care. The knowledge and skills that pediatricians bring to the care of children in foster and kinship care also apply to the larger population of children whose families are involved with child welfare agencies.Of 3.3 million child abuse and neglect reports in 2010, 436,321 (22%) were substantiated, and 254,000 children were removed to foster care. Over the past decade, the increasing trend toward keeping children with their birth parents or with kin caregivers after child protective investigation has reduced the total number of children in foster care. In the United States, on September 30, 2010, 408,425 children and adolescents resided in foster care, 26% in a relative (kinship) foster home, 48% in a nonrelative foster home, and 9% in either a group home or residential care setting. Of the remainder, 4% lived with a preadoptive family, 5% were on a trial discharge with their parents, and 2% were listed as “run-away.”Estimates suggest that more than 700,000 individual children have spent some time in foster care during the preceding 12 months. Census data indicate that approximately four to eight times as many children and teenagers live in informal, unregulated kinship care without child welfare involvement. Approximately 40% of those in foster care are teenagers, whereas 30% are children under age 5 years. Children in foster care range in age from birth to 21 years, although 47 states still emancipate adolescents at age 18 years.Minorities are represented prominently in foster care. In 2010, 29% of children were of African American heritage, 21% Hispanic, 41% white, and 5% of two or more races. Significant concern exists that the overrepresentation of minority children reflects bias in child protective referrals, investigation, and removal, as well as a lower likelihood of reunification after removal.Discrete subpopulations in foster care that present with unique health needs include children who have multiple handicaps, teenagers involved with juvenile justice, pregnant and parenting teenagers, and unaccompanied refugee minors from countries ravaged by war or severe internal strife.The average length of stay in foster care in 2010 was 25 months, with a median of 14.5 months. The lower median is attributed to more intensive permanency planning, resulting in shorter times to reunification or placement with extended family. However, the higher mean is affected by the 25% of children who remain in care for years.Length of stay is affected by several factors: the biological family’s cooperation with the individualized case plan for their family; the availability of appropriate extended family to care for the child; diligence in permanency planning by child welfare; and the challenges of finding adoptive resources for older children, minority children, large sibling groups, and children who have significant behavioral and developmental problems.Longer stays in foster care are associated with a reduced likelihood of reunification and an increased number of placements. Approximately 50% of children and teenagers will experience more than one foster care placement, with approximately 25% having three or more placements.In 2010, of the 254,114 children who exited foster care, 51% returned to their parents and 14% went to a relative or guardian, whereas 21% were adopted and 11% aged out of foster care. The vast majority of the 27,854 individuals who aged out were emancipated at age 18 years.Because the long-term benefit of foster care placement is uncertain, admission to foster care is and should be difficult.Almost all children entering foster care are placed involuntarily by court order after child protective investigation. Child neglect, including lack of supervision or neglect of basic nutritional, educational, and medical needs, is the most commonly cited reason for placement. Overall, approximately 70% of admissions are for maltreatment. Teenagers tend to be placed for disruptive behaviors through either the juvenile justice system or as persons in need of supervision. Voluntary placements constitute less than 1% of admissions and often are made by families as a means of accessing treatment services for a child or teenager who has complex mental health or medical problems.Families whose children reside in foster care come from all walks of life, but financial poverty remains a pervasive common factor underlying foster care placement (>50% of children live with impoverished families before foster care). Poverty, however, extends beyond the financial to the lack of the normal, predictable, nurturing environment that promotes good developmental and emotional health. Most children have experienced childhood adversities beyond maltreatment, including exposure to significant violence in their homes (84%) or communities placement, report that of caregivers have parenting with mental health abuse or often lack have and high and are one third of birth parents to being or as children, and about the same percentage spent time in foster care. Children often have multiple caregivers before placement in foster care. of a child often with child welfare with the after have been when the child’s health and are at imminent that childhood trauma or multiple childhood and are associated with and long-term mental health, developmental, and health exposure and in the of protective the of the in a those of the involved in emotional and children entering foster care with their and adversities are children who have emotional, developmental, and health on and are but data indicate that stability in a nurturing and family promotes after childhood foster care is with and for children. high of family from the family of origin and all that is familiar is experience for many children, for children, placement in foster care may be the time they have stable placement in a foster home can promote the ongoing and to foster care may a child’s of highlights an increasing focus on involving pediatricians in supporting children in foster care. The to and of foster care to identify kinship resources at to foster care, promote and support kinship care, children in their of support American in keeping children foster care and resources for with a of independent for pediatric health states to health for children in foster care, pediatricians in the of such health improve health-care promote the of medical and health foster care system is in of providing children with nurturing families, but also complex in legislation of and but for the of foster care with which in to or child welfare by the foster care system remains by birth parents who have multiple problems, and and that appear to be in with child welfare is for and for is a complex multiple skills with Most however, more than of in many case for the biological family, parents the care of their children while to with or resources are mental health, parenting medical care, and and to promote also educational, developmental, medical, and mental health services for children, and support the foster parents in their care. birth parents are or to the for reunification, have the of supporting through the of permanency also are to children and a of to a family than their family of also and foster parents. have a with the system in their family court and the juvenile justice of a child from a family, the prepare a court the for the child or in foster care, the to court at to provide ongoing for the of placement and to their on of parents and children toward child in foster care is represented in court by a who may or may not be an on the In some states, in the court also may a special on of the who are not special many to the child’s for to the oversight with the court have the of on information to in a child remains in placement after or services for biological and at the case for a child in care to placement or an permanency is the court the permanency with the that such a is on the from all child welfare mental health and and the youth who is of age and developmental to on his or her for the child and childhood trauma remains parents are the and of the foster care system, and foster parenting is the Foster parents come from all walks of life, on tend to be be of lower have at a high be and have children of their have and most are by a to for children. foster parents with the of percentage of foster parents are and are to that can foster and 5% of foster families undergo to as resources for or children. However, most foster parents little about parenting children who have significant trauma and There are some studies that specific and for foster parents and birth parents as Foster and parenting for foster improve outcomes for children, but these have not for foster parenting are a for child in their care that is by individual The is by the child’s health needs, and the of the parenting The is to needs, and most and recent that approximately two of the of parenting a child in foster and of foster families are some of the most child welfare are in the foster care system in of and Foster families the of the for children and teenagers, but are to the system, and the birth family for the child’s care. remains with the birth a child is for but the foster care is for that a child’s needs are and the child is well of youth in foster care, reside in residential or group home placements, which can of child health services are but is The outcomes of group care have not been well and there to be in the of such of a child with his or her biological is the best for reunification, may be for the parents and The of the is Children who have been or by their parents may not in a setting. parents may not the need to focus on the child during and focus on their issues or with child parents may to the of the child with the and may which is and for children, and and the the with separation that may be for and through with by in a setting. to a or the home, the is before placement may for more with the birth but kin caregivers also may unique challenges they toward the birth are about or have to court-ordered to which the and is for of in which a mental health parents identify their child’s their child’s developmental parenting skills in parenting and to their child in an appropriate such as or still are not because such are and and is in which prepare birth parents for the stay on during the and with to the challenges associated with children may encounter adversities in foster care. in foster care placement, in or child care placement, separation from the of children entering or their foster home, by birth parents, a with their foster being or and court are but some of the children may an child, one can be to is as the of a child to foster care after reunification, placement with extended family or guardian, or adoption. on the to 30% of children to foster care, as a result of a of reunification with their birth parents. but percentage of undergo during an parents of their children in the care and of the or of can be as of a in which the the child’s the child either the age of majority or is parents to their children for more of involuntarily after at reunification have The can years, during which time but at reunification and permanency planning by federal legislation in states to a child has been in foster care for of the past and when there is reason not to the and in the with which they this federal child as a result of the of studies on childhood and placement has toward a to foster care, the is not to permanency on the of the out of foster care several Over of children adopted out of care are adopted by their foster parents, and 30% are adopted by kinship caregivers. to the most recent there were children out of foster care in 2010, of were for and resided in preadoptive children without an adoptive tend to be older, minority children, to be of large sibling groups, or to have significant emotional and behavioral problems, that to be to parents most often child welfare as an their and the reason for the of their family. some parents with child welfare either to remain with a or in that the child for the removal, whereas the of their family and for the resources that child welfare birth parents have trauma and their that have and lack the most basic of parenting and of their children may their of and welfare may children in a an foster home, or the home of a the of the court after child protective investigation. with kin caregivers is to be less the child has a with The in foster care may be with a of from child protective to health and members of the foster to foster care often are for the several a by most child welfare as a time of emotional for the and Children who have severe trauma may to behaviors that were in their but in the setting. The majority of children are by they not and or in in foster care often about they are in foster care, and children may for the of their about the of their parents and and their they will be in care, or when their parents will come for or when a will out of or parents may make they not or Other children about being in foster care, to their and of children and to foster parents and may their less birth as a in parenting or between for children and Children may not be for discharge from foster care or to a in foster care placement are for children, that a that of and for placements but include child behavior problems, foster between birth and foster parents, and a foster home may be or neglect a child’s needs, resulting in foster care is because the care is and nurturing foster a of and for the child, the child to the of family and to the The foster care placement is stable during the child’s time in care. The foster and birth and on of the The birth for at and of the services by child Child welfare the birth identify and on the family’s and the crisis that to the family’s is Children appropriate mental health and their parents in those services as the foster care experience not this in foster care are a have in foster care, whereas foster care through the juvenile justice system or are placed by a to their behaviors or to access appropriate mental health-care tend to have the placement they experience a variety of foster care time family group residential or and between foster care, home, juvenile percentage of teenagers are and have significant behavior teenagers may lack the to in or parenting teenagers are group who may be living with their children or placed from they have significant mental health issues or constitute a risk to their teenagers foster care as unaccompanied refugee having to the United from a variety of countries after or the of their majority of adolescents in foster care reside in their are is and they mental health services and adolescents in foster care have experienced childhood including maltreatment, as children in foster care. have and but their including and may be that the underlying remain in foster care are less to permanency, either through reunification or adoption. to parents or relatives, but many age out at age 18 years, or are to or placement care or group home care). to and for independent living is resources are Foster or kin families who remain in youth are their best and youth who identify and remain to foster parents, or appear to fare is about the outcomes of youth who have aged out is a of most youth have spent at one and many have an who are a decade removed from foster care are have with in and have high of mental health problems, including and studies indicate that with a of foster care are the and is the time during which the individual is to a stable in a of in and a larger of and in to in foster care, minority lack of and a lack of are outcomes of the of multiple and a of is from living in the of foster abuse and neglect, with separation and and a lack of role for result in a high prevalence of who are and to well are those foster youth who are and a multiple childhood health issues of children in foster care are in their of neglect, and and multiple childhood and childhood with the lack of protective the health of children in foster care. The defines children in foster care as children with special health-care needs because of their high prevalence of medical developmental dental problems, and behavioral, emotional, and mental health In of children in foster care have issues related to family about the health of the foster care population have to care, 30% to have at one medical and approximately have complex health problems. The for the high prevalence of health include medical neglect or lack of access to health services before foster of the to with child’s health needs, resulting in and the of childhood adversities on health. and developmental are and may be the result of the of and childhood or the result of studies report that the ongoing health of children in foster care are mental health and developmental problems. of children under age foster care with developmental in at one and to 70% of children age 5 have a mental health or behavioral are in the adversities and trauma children have experienced before foster care. that may have been in a or environment in a more setting. that significant behavioral of by developmental problems, to placement in emotional and mental health children foster care, their health not appear to improve The of the population the likelihood that they will to have access to information on admission foster care is foster parents have the of knowledge to as the health-care the foster system on to this complex most children in foster care have health in the of this also access to health-care because of in and of medical to in care may access to medical care, but mental health access for children in foster care. to support and foster parents about a child’s medical, developmental, and mental health needs and to appropriate treatment can to in placement when foster parents and requirements may and treatment and care can be is not However, has specific about who can for health-care on of a child in foster care. states, for of the guardian, who is the birth for including of In child welfare have in for and health-care should issues with their child welfare the health of the legislation states to health for children in foster care, is in in most with intensive care are because health-care the of care children children in foster care will their health-care as children who have special health-care needs in the of a pediatric medical The has a number of resources to pediatric but the of the medical home for the child in foster care are as The medical home should the health-care for children and teenagers in foster care by the on Foster from for Children and in Foster The are on the Foster was for by child mental health, and and youth in foster care. resources and may also be to pediatricians in with states and foster care for health brief of the health-care for children in foster care are listed in and should children and after to care, because often more health needs than one and they a between the and The admission health-care for all children, but for those with special health-care Children in foster care should have health-care and those for all children to all of their health developmental, educational, emotional and behavioral, and health-care encounter should include for child abuse and neglect in the placement. Foster that should be in to the children who have complex medical, developmental, or mental health problems, the may more health health is the most important health-care need of children in foster care. Children need and of mental health and to pediatric mental health of mental health-care basic should be in when and are two health needs of children in foster care. and may result in and multiple and are the most to be developmental for all children in foster care is not the pediatric should at a developmental to identify children in need of a some children developmental skills and in foster care, child who has behavioral or in should an It is that the with the child’s to that needs are and parents in most communities report that children in foster care have access to dental care, a high prevalence of significant dental are to with their health and dental to access issues for children in foster is a and in foster care. foster families have a of but the should not that they have in parenting children and teenagers who have past and ongoing In to the should issues specific to foster care, such as on the child’s parenting the of trauma on child supporting children through permanency planning, in placement, significant the need for and with birth parents to and and children should be about planning for their and with teenagers in foster care, have their to to a pediatric can foster parents the emotional while supporting an parenting for foster families and youth in foster care and can a foster care placement for a the also the birth and the child’s in these is the of the foster care with the as the case However, the pediatric medical home has an important role to play in that a child in foster care all health-care in a and that and youth in care all and in the health-care that health with child welfare to and information health-care are in are in a unique position to for in of care for children in foster care, in of the health in the can with their the and a and on in the of Children in Foster and the children and families for their and her at Pediatrics and the of for their and
Katharin Hermenau et al. · 2016 · Trauma Violence & Abuse · Open access
Quality of child care has been shown to have a crucial impact on children's development and psychological adjustment, particularly for orphans with a history of maltreatment and trauma. However, adequate care for orphans is often impacted by unfavorable caregiver-child ratios and poorly trained, overburdened personnel, especially in institutional care in countries with limited resources and large numbers of orphans. This systematic review investigated the effects of structural interventions and caregiver trainings on child development in institutional environments. The 24 intervention studies included in this systematic review reported beneficial effects on the children's emotional, social, and cognitive development. Yet, few studies focused on effects of interventions on the child-caregiver relationship or the general institutional environment. Moreover, our review revealed that interventions aimed at improving institutional care settings have largely neglected violence and abuse prevention. Unfortunately, our findings are partially limited by constraints of study design and methodology. In sum, this systematic review sheds light on obstacles and possibilities for the improvement in institutional care. There must be greater efforts at preventing violence, abuse, and neglect of children living in institutional care. Therefore, we advocate for combining attachment theory-based models with maltreatment prevention approaches and then testing them using rigorous scientific standards. By using approaches grounded in the evidence, it could be possible to enable more children to grow up in supportive and nonviolent environments.
Dan J. Stein et al. · 2020 · BMC Medicine · Open access
An update of the chapter on Mental, Behavioral and Neurodevelopmental Disorders in the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD) is of great interest around the world. The recent approval of the 11th Revision of the ICD (ICD-11) by the World Health Organization (WHO) raises broad questions about the status of nosology of mental disorders as a whole as well as more focused questions regarding changes to the diagnostic guidelines for specific conditions and the implications of these changes for practice and research. This Forum brings together a broad range of experts to reflect on key changes and controversies in the ICD-11 classification of mental disorders. Taken together, there is consensus that the WHO's focus on global applicability and clinical utility in developing the diagnostic guidelines for this chapter will maximize the likelihood that it will be adopted by mental health professionals and administrators. This focus is also expected to enhance the application of the guidelines in non-specialist settings and their usefulness for scaling up evidence-based interventions. The new mental disorders classification in ICD-11 and its accompanying diagnostic guidelines therefore represent an important, albeit iterative, advance for the field.
Harold G. Koenig · 2012 · ISRN Psychiatry · Open access
This paper provides a concise but comprehensive review of research on religion/spirituality (R/S) and both mental health and physical health. It is based on a systematic review of original data-based quantitative research published in peer-reviewed journals between 1872 and 2010, including a few seminal articles published since 2010. First, I provide a brief historical background to set the stage. Then I review research on R/S and mental health, examining relationships with both positive and negative mental health outcomes, where positive outcomes include well-being, happiness, hope, optimism, and gratefulness, and negative outcomes involve depression, suicide, anxiety, psychosis, substance abuse, delinquency/crime, marital instability, and personality traits (positive and negative). I then explain how and why R/S might influence mental health. Next, I review research on R/S and health behaviors such as physical activity, cigarette smoking, diet, and sexual practices, followed by a review of relationships between R/S and heart disease, hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, Alzheimer's disease and dementia, immune functions, endocrine functions, cancer, overall mortality, physical disability, pain, and somatic symptoms. I then present a theoretical model explaining how R/S might influence physical health. Finally, I discuss what health professionals should do in light of these research findings and make recommendations in this regard.
Patrick Luyten et al. · 2020 · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · Open access
Mentalizing is the capacity to understand others and oneself in terms of internal mental states. It is assumed to be underpinned by four dimensions: automatic-controlled, internally-externally focused, self-other, and cognitive-affective. Research suggests that mental disorders are associated with different imbalances in these dimensions. Addressing the quality of mentalizing as part of psychosocial treatments may benefit individuals with various mental disorders. We suggest that mentalizing is a helpful transtheoretical and transdiagnostic concept to explain vulnerability to psychopathology and its treatment. This review summarizes the mentalizing approach to psychopathology from a developmental socioecological evolutionary perspective. We then focus on the application of the mentalizing approach to personality disorders, and we review studies that have extended this approach to other types of psychopathology, including depression, anxiety, and eating disorders. We summarize core principles of mentalization-based treatments and preventive interventions and the evidence for their effectiveness. We conclude with recommendations for future research.
Eeske van Roekel et al. · 2019 · Journal of Research on Adolescence · Open access
The use of ambulatory assessment (AA) and related methods (experience sampling, ecological momentary assessment) has greatly increased within the field of adolescent psychology. In this guide, we describe important practices for conducting AA studies in adolescent samples. To better understand how researchers have been implementing AA study designs, we present a review of 23 AA studies that were conducted in adolescent samples from 2017. Results suggest that there is heterogeneity in how AA studies in youth are conducted and reported. Based on these insights, we provide recommendations with regard to participant recruitment, sampling scheme, item selection, power analysis, and software choice. Further, we provide a checklist for reporting on AA studies in adolescent samples that can be used as a guideline for future studies.